STARS apology (STARS)

To search this forum for keywords, type your keywords in the "Forums Search" box on the right. To search specific forum topics, click the "Advanced Search" link on the right.

1 reply [Last post]
Offline
AASHE Member
Joined: Sep 9 2011

This post is related to STARS, AASHE's Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System.

Dear former employers.

I am sorry that you listened to me and your own environmental ethos and that in doing so you became pioneers in the field of campus recycling and waste reduction.

To the schools with whom I implemented a food waste composting programs as far back as 1994, and all those with whom I implemented composting programs thereafter, I am sorry.

To the several schools throughout the 90s and early 2000s with who I implemented programs to reduce printing in computer labs, including charging for printing, eliminating of banner pages, and other methodology, I am sorry.
To all of the schools with whom I implemented a reuse program to collect clothing, canned food, and furniture, I am sorry, as far back as the early 1990’s, I am sorry.

To the school with whom I doubled your paper recycling and increased your C&D recycling exponentially between 2000 and 2005, I am sorry.
To all the schools and departments thereof for whom I set up your initial cardboard recycling program, some of which ran for as much as a decade and a half prior to 2005, I am sorry.

For those of you for whom I set up your first bottle & can recycling program, and with whom I continued expanding the tons recovered by those programs despite the fact that the manufacturers kept lightweighting each of those containers on us, I am sorry.
To the school with whom I cut your annual trash tonnage in half from 1992 to 2010, despite increases in enrollment and building square footage on campus, I am sorry that you will only get credit for the last couple hundred tons of waste reduction and not the 400-500 tons of waste reduction that preceded it.

I am sorry that our early success appears to have cheated you out of STARS credits. Had you not listened to me or your own environmental ethic, you might now be better recognized for your incredible recycling and waste reduction efforts. Had you done nothing and waited to implement programs, like too many of your peers, you might now have a much higher baseline of waste from which to reduce and be credited for your waste reduction efforts. Had you waited till 2006 like too many of your peers, you might get more STARS points for low hanging fruit that you removed from your waste stream decades earlier, a model that some of your peers are only now awakening to.

I hope that someday the new campus sustainability movement will sufficiently recognize the incredible efforts of the campus sustainability and recycling pioneers that preceded the release of An Inconvenient Truth. I hope that they will someday allow you and some of your peers to baseline your efforts in a way that recognizes the advancements that you made before some of your current student were even born. I hope that in recognizing those pioneering efforts, folks will find a way to reward your innovation instead of penalizing you for it. Until then, I can only apologize for our early success and my encouragement of it.

I recognize that the extra decade or more of scope 3 emissions reductions that you achieved, recycling revenues that you earned, and avoided landfill fees that you realized might be hollow reward. And for that, I am truly sorry.

Offline
AASHE Member
Joined: Aug 24 2009

Thanks for your humorous take on this issue, Roger.

For what it's worth, the STARS Steering Committee and staff are aware of the limitations of the baseline approach and we continue to welcome constructive suggestions for improving these credits. In fact, we are currently considering changes to the baseline credits for STARS 2.0. One option is to let institutions choose their own baseline year. Another approach under consideration, which could be used in combination with or instead of the choose-your-own baseline concept, would score institutions based on their performance relative to an absolute benchmark. Of course, both of these approaches have some drawbacks of their own (which is why we didn't go with them in the first place), but my sense from many conversations on this issue is that the community prefers these approaches over the 2005 baseline that we have been using.

We hope to release a draft version of STARS 2.0 for public comment this fall, so stay tuned for that. This new version of STARS is the primary opportunity for substantially altering the baseline credits so I hope all interested parties will participate in the process and submit comments. In the meantime of course, please don't hesitate to share any ideas you have for how we could change the baseline credits.

Warm Regards,

Julian
Chair, STARS Steering Committee

--
Julian Dautremont-Smith
Chief Sustainability Officer
Alfred State College
(607) 587-4011
dautrej@alfredstate.edu